“I am most anxious to enlist everyone who can speak or write to join in checking this mad, wicked folly of ‘Women’s Rights,’ with all its attendant horrors, on which her poor feeble sex is bent, forgetting every sense of womanly feelings and propriety. Feminists ought to get a good whipping. Were woman to ‘unsex’ themselves by claiming equality with men, they would become the most hateful, heathen and disgusting of beings and would surely perish without male protection.”
-- Her Majesty Queen Victoria
After the disgusting mockery that was the London's opening ceremony to the Olympics last Saturday, which was little more than an vulgar display of cuckoldry for all the world to see; a brazen effrontery of the Left's triumph over the sane people (who now probably constitute a minority) left in Britain and Western Europe. It was a spit in the face to those on the Right. "You've lost. Your country's have lost. It's game over. We've prevailed and there's nothing you can do now except watch it all go down in flames" could be heard from behind the curtains as the show was unfolding.
After that, it's hard to imagine Britain going even lower, but they've managed, yet again, to do just that...
At the end of May, the National Health Service, the largest employer in Britain—and the fifth largest in the world—took the decision to excise the six-letter f-word from a pamphlet on rearing children that it has been giving to mothers- and fathers-to-be for the past 14 years. The pamphlet will no longer refer to fathers following a complaint from one person—yes, that is all it takes to airbrush people from history in modern Britain—who was concerned that such terminology is “not inclusive of people in same-sex relationships.” From now on the pamphlet will refer to mothers and “partners.” Dads are so 20th century.Fathers are no longer deemed important, or even a necessary part of the family by Britain's National Health Service, which is, as previously mentioned, Britain's LARGEST employer and the FIFTH LARGEST in the world. When an organization of such stature does something like this it should not be overlooked, because it is a big deal. The implications are broad. It's like throwing a small pebble into a lake and watching the ripples expand around it. So too will the ripples of this expand around it until it encompasses all of British society. What we're seeing here is the gradual erasure of the traditional family structure and the forging of the new family "structure," if you can call it that. It seems to me that this new "structure" isn't structured at all, but a complete loss of structure. The proponents of the new family structure want to dismantle all remnants of the original family structure i.e. the nuclear family with two stable parents of the opposite sex and replace with, well, nothing... They don't want a new family structure. They want NO structure. One man with one woman is too passe. A man and a man or a woman and a woman will suffice. A man and two men or three men or four or a woman and two or three or four or more women will do just as well too. Hell, any combination of any number of men or women of any of the myriad of sexual orientations that we can choose from today will be fine according to them. Everything is fine, just as long as it isn't the dreaded and outdated one man with one women paradigm of yore, because that's not "progressive" enough. You might say I'm falling victim to the slippery slope fallacy, but read some of their literature and you might think otherwise. Read some of what the "social justice" brigade on tumblr or reddit have to say. Many of them consider the traditional family structure a form of systematic oppression. Their goal is to completely dismantle the system.
The reason this is such a big deal is because what we've observed over and over and over again is that a family with TWO parents is crucial to a child's well being. Now, I haven't done any research on whether or not it matters if the two parents are of the opposite sex so I have no idea what implications same sex parents have on their children. I shall make no judgments on what hasn't currently been verified by studies and semi-scientific inquiry. I'm a skeptic, after all. And it should be noted that I have no problem with homosexuals... but that's besides the point. What we do know is we see significant disparities of crime, poverty, and health when just one parent is removed. The overwhelming majority of the data shows us that, but the vile Left will keep on ignoring it, because FACTS run counter to their arguments and are an obstacle in their attempts to create their Left-wing utopia. That's why those of us who oppose them aka sane people need to keep hammering them with the facts and dismantling, piece by piece, their ideology. We can't let them succeed.
I'll just leave on this note: Everytime I read something about the Brits, it seems like they've found yet another way to get worse. Britain, please. GET. YOUR. SHIT. TOGETHER.
The source for all this non-sense: http://www.the-spearhead.com/2012/07/31/britains-national-health-service-erases-fathers/